Because 3 and 5 are basically the same number.
If you press a scale of -Infinity to Infinity into a defined amount of space, 3 and 5 have virtually no space between them. In this scenario, 3 and 5 would be the same.
Moderator: Moderators
Braveskin wrote:Because 3 and 5 are basically the same number.
If you press a scale of -Infinity to Infinity into a defined amount of space, 3 and 5 have virtually no space between them. In this scenario, 3 and 5 would be the same.
Triented wrote:Braveskin wrote:Because 3 and 5 are basically the same number.
If you press a scale of -Infinity to Infinity into a defined amount of space, 3 and 5 have virtually no space between them. In this scenario, 3 and 5 would be the same.
He does have a good point. However numbers that look the same is a better fit in my vocabulary.
Like a list.
52
5S
4A
6b
0O
^^= #'s & letters that look the same.
Possibly?
The inspiration for 1337, numbers that look like letters.
Wow.. the only thing that looks right in your sentence is dyslexia.Perrinoia wrote:Triented wrote:Braveskin wrote:Because 3 and 5 are basically the same number.
If you press a scale of -Infinity to Infinity into a defined amount of space, 3 and 5 have virtually no space between them. In this scenario, 3 and 5 would be the same.
He does have a good point. However numbers that look the same is a better fit in my vocabulary.
Like a list.
52
5S
4A
6b
0O
^^= #'s & letters that look the same.
Possibly?
The inspiration for 1337, numbers that look like letters.
what does this have to do with max's aixelsyd?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest